Re: that old GNU/Linux argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 21, 2008, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Björn Persson wrote:
>> 
>> I don't think I'll get everyone to agree on a definition. I don't
>> even think all the anti-GNU/Linux folks will agree on a definition.

> I'm not sure there is an anti-GNU/Linux factor - just a pro "the other
> 85%" of the distro unwilling to give  unfair naming rights.

Naming it after 2% is fair, while naming it after 15% isn't.  Care to
explain the rationale behind this conclusion?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member       ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux