On Jul 20, 2008, Anders Karlsson <anders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [20080720 19:42]: >> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/agpl-3.0.html > So the part of the work that is non-GPL licensed, can stay non-GPL > licensed in the combined works and derivatives? If by 'non-GPL' you mean AGPL, then yes. Otherwise, no, it's not LGPL. Some other form of license compatibility is required for the whole work to be distributable and thus offerable for public execution over a computer network. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
