Re: that old GNU/Linux argument

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: that old GNU/Linux argument
• From: Timothy Murphy <gayleard@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:03:59 +0100
• Organization: Trinity College
• References: <16de708d0807122324m6b398be3tbfba7cf0d4f1a514@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <orbq0yz70s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1216438430.12770.99.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200807191401.19618.listor3.rombobeorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KNode/0.10.9

Björn Persson wrote:

>> Has HURD actually become a working kernel?? Ric
> 
> Apparently yes:
> 
> http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-install

The installation instructions sound almost farcically bad.

Bizarrely, it seems one has to pay for a "Live Hurd CD".



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: that old GNU/Linux argument
    • From: Anders Karlsson
  • Re: that old GNU/Linux argument
    • From: Björn Persson

• References:
  • Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
    • From: Arthur Pemberton
  • Re: that old GNU/Linux argument
    • From: Alexandre Oliva
  • Re: that old GNU/Linux argument
    • From: Ric Moore
  • Re: that old GNU/Linux argument
    • From: Björn Persson

• Prev by Date: Re: How is one supposed to use the KDE4 desktop ?
• Next by Date: Re: Dependency hell again. Or is it still?
• Previous by thread: Re: that old GNU/Linux argument
• Next by thread: Re: that old GNU/Linux argument
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread