On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 13:34 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > > > > A rare bit of honesty there: > > > > "In 2008, we found that GNU packages made up 15% of the “main” > > repository of the gNewSense GNU/Linux distribution. Linux made > > up 1.5%. So the same argument would apply even more strongly > > to calling it “Linux” > > You're reading it incorrectly, by leaving out the question: > > GNU is a small fraction of the system nowadays, so why should we > mention it? > > GNU is arguing, in the quote you posted, that if it is inappropriate to > include GNU in the name for a GNU/Linux distribution, then it is even > more strongly inappropriate to call it "Linux". Linux is a much smaller > and less significant portion of a GNU/Linux distribution than GNU is. Because everyone loves and admires Linus. You could take him home to Mom and say "This is my friend, Linus." and she'd beam with approval. Take RHS home to Mom for dinner.... it could get embarrassing. So, speaking for myself, if I wanted to hold up a figure that is representative and leader of my cherished OS, guess who I'd pick?? Besides, T.A.G. was about free software since 1980. (Thieves and Assassins Guild) If it wasn't free, it was made free. <grins> Ric -- ---------------------------------------------------- My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar https://oar.dev.java.net/ Verizon Cell # 336-254-1339 ----------------------------------------------------- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
