> ---- max <maximilianbianco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2 - The only other sane thing I could advise you too do is bounce your > > question off the fedora-selinux list. I would include a reference to > > this thread and all the relevant details. The kernel your running, the > > policy version (rpm -qa | grep selinux...setrouble) , setroubleshoot > > version, the error messages below , and that you run in permissive and > > used preupgrade to go from f8 to f9. > > This will ensure that the right people see your message, this list is > > also monitored but I think when they get busy fedora-selinux is likely > > to still get checked more often than fedora-list. > > I was trying to avoid this. I already get several hundred e-mails per day and I would guess that the selinux list is pretty busy too. Oh well, I'll just have to deal with it for a while. I found this in the SELinux list archives: http://www.nsa.gov/SELinux/list-archive/0801/thread_body36.cfm which appears to say there was a problem but it was fixed in a patch. I wonder if it has not made it to F9 yet? Steve -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
