Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gordon Messmer wrote:

It's not an either/or question. They are right that it is inappropriate but in both cases, not just the straw man they set up. Call it Fedora, call it freebsd, call it OpenSolaris, and leave politics out of it.

I don't think that they're arguing at all that it's inappropriate to call it GNU/Linux. They're illustrating that the argument which is often used for calling a system Linux -- that GNU is a small component of a typical GNU/Linux distribution -- is a ridiculous argument, since Linux is a much smaller component of the distribution.

But it is equally ridiculous either way, when 80+% is neither GNU nor Linux code. Calling it an xwindow system would make more sense. Or perhaps a firefox/thunderbird/openoffice.org system - with most of the other parts interchangeable.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux