Re: F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?
• From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:52:49 +0000 (UTC)
• References: <48794EAB.1040407@xxxxxxxxx> <1216007377.4448.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <487BEBC4.8080302@xxxxxxxxx> <1216085650.21595.81.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan <at> gmail.com> writes:
> The fact that there's no visible license makes me think it's not Open
> Source or Free within the accepted guidelines, just that they provide
> source code.

The source files have clear GPLv2+ license headers. It's just the copy of the 
GPL which is missing.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?
    • From: Patrick O'Callaghan

• References:
  • F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?
    • From: Dan Thurman
  • Re: F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?
    • From: Patrick O'Callaghan
  • Re: F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?
    • From: Dan Thurman
  • Re: F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?
    • From: Patrick O'Callaghan

• Prev by Date: Re: Autostart under KDE-4
• Next by Date: Re: setroub;eshoot problem
• Previous by thread: Re: F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?
• Next by thread: Re: F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread