Re: F9: Is GVFS a normal installation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: F9: Is GVFS a normal installation?
From: Dan Thurman <dant@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:22:50 -0700
In-reply-to: <1215710436.13832.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: DBT And Associates
References: <487641AF.3010209@xxxxxxxxx> <1215710436.13832.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: dant@xxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)

Title: Re: F9: Is GVFS a normal installation?

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:06 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
> Is GVFS a standard part of installation? If not, can it be safely
> removed?

AFAIK it's a standard part of Gnome.

poc

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Ok, thanks!
Dan

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

References:
- F9: Is GVFS a normal installation?
  - From: Dan Thurman
- Re: F9: Is GVFS a normal installation?
  - From: Patrick O'Callaghan

Prev by Date: Re: F9: Is GVFS a normal installation?
Next by Date: Re: Closed source modules will be banned from kernel?
Previous by thread: Re: F9: Is GVFS a normal installation?
Next by thread: Re: How to boot from floppy to install Fedora 9 from CD?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]