On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:11 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote: > >>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Patrick> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 14:23 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote: > >> >>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> > >> writes: > >> > Patrick> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 14:02 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote: > > >> >>>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> writes: > >> >> > Colin> I dare say libusb may well have been updated during the > Colin> last week. It is currently at libusb-0.1.12-15.fc9.x86_64 . > >> >> > >> >> If I do rpm -q -i on it it says the install date is in > >> May. I >> suspect that is when I installed Fedora 9. But I > >> don't see an >> update date. > >> > Patrick> grep libusb /var/log/yum.log > >> > >> Nothing. > > Patrick> Aaaaaarrrrrrrrgggghhhhh. Encroaching senility. I meant > > I'll race you :-) > > Patrick> udev, not libusb. You want udev-124-1.fc9.2.x86_64 > > That's what I have. It was updated yesterday. > Hm. Sounds suspicious. > > How do I revert to .1.x86_64? As I understand it yesterday's update was meant as a temporary fix to a problem introduced a few days ago, so *in theory* it shouldn't be the cause of your problem. Of course if you discover that it is then definitely report it to Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451320 If you want to revert, you probably still have the old package in /var/cache/yum, so "rpm --oldpackage ..." should be able to install it (modulo any dependencies). poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
