On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 12:17 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Andrew Kelly <akelly@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 15:03 -0600, linuxguy wrote: > >> On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 09:38 -0700, Mike Bird wrote: > >> > QUESTION TO DEVELOPERS: Is there any hope of a full KDE 3.5 > >> > in F10, plus an upgrade path from F8 to F10 that preserves > >> > KDE 3.5 configurations? > >> > > >> > KDE 4.0 is incomplete and not suitable for most users. > >> > >> > >> I totally agree ! I was going to post about this but I didn't want to > >> upset the group. But its true ! F9 is the WORST RH/Fedora release I > >> have ever used and I've been doing this since RH8. > >> > >> I want KDE 3.5 back for F10. > >> > >> And don't give me the crap that Fedora is bleeding edge software. F9 > >> is beyond bleeding, its suicidal. > >> > > > > F10 will be out before you know it, and F8 still gets dozens of updates > > a week. I still can't get that to sit well with me. Are things being > > accelerated to the point of there being 5 Fedora releases for each RHEL > > release? Or is EL re-tooling for annual releases, maybe? > > > > Andy > > Has anything change? Doesn't Fedora still follow it's original 6 month > release cycle? Yeah, guess you're right, Arthur. Sure feels quicker to me lately, though. Don't know why. Mebbe it's just my brain slowing down. When is RHEL 6 supposed to release? Andy > > -- > Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine > ( www.pembo13.com ) > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
