On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Mike Bird <mgb-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat June 14 2008 14:21:29 Antonio Olivares wrote: >> stay here and write many, many bug reports, rally the troops in hopes of >> making KDE 4.X the best KDE that is possible, take the positives the good >> things and try to turn your face to bad things, the things you do not like >> about KDE. In all the bad, there has to be something good. Okular is very >> good. Evince is also. I can use either or to view multiple document >> formats, ie., dvi, pdf, ps, etc. . Let the battle to which desktop in >> Fedora 9 or higher begin, which one earns your respect and choice after >> all, you can make other statements that can make more impact. > > There is reason to hope that in a couple of years KDE 4.x will be better > than KDE 3.5, but for now KDE 4.x is unproductive for most users. > > Distros that don't provide KDE 3.5 for their KDE users while KDE 4.x is > being developed will simply lose most of their KDE users. That is not a > good thing for Fedora and that is not a good thing for Red Hat. And there > are things I'd rather be doing than migrating a bunch of installations to > some other distro. > > --Mike Bird Why not use the version of Fedora that last has KDE 3.5 if this is such a big deal for you? -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
