Re: surely an ordinary package shouldn't depend on devel packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:49:52 +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:

> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> I'd wager that xine has libxine statically linked and/or compiled in.
> > 
> > No, libxine.so is just a symlink pointing to the real and versioned
> > library file in the xine-lib package. This symlink is needed only when
> > building software -- it's the link that makes the -lxine linker
> > command work.
> 
> Yes, Redhat and Fedora have always done this.
> 
> The executables look for <library>.so.<version> and that is a symlink to
> <library>.so.<full-version> in one of the ld.so.conf paths.

It's the "right thing to do" and not specific to Red Hat or Fedora.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux