On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:58:28 -0400, "McGuffey, David C." <DAVID.C.MCGUFFEY@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So...in light of those two big glaring problems/failures, automation is > being attempted on a number of fronts, with the DHS program apparently > being only one. The automation part only flags the questionable spots that need to be looked at and provide a hint as to what to look for. Someone still has to wade through all of reports to see which things are really a problem. > Since I'm actively using Fedora at home and in an office lab, I was very > interested in whether the DHS (or any) tool development program was > providing a benefit to the open source community, and the security of > the resultant products. The NSA's SELinux contribution is pretty significant, though I don't know if DHS is funding any of the ongoing work with it. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
