On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:13 AM, François Patte <francois.patte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, it does, but I also have this problem:
http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.3c05a62b
mainly with the i386 architecture. My question is: why do
we need nspluginwrapper for i386?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I update my f8 system and firefox version is now -2.0.0.14.
the adobe plugin nppdf.so for pdf seems to no longer work with this
version....
Am I right?
Well, it does, but I also have this problem:
http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.3c05a62b
mainly with the i386 architecture. My question is: why do
we need nspluginwrapper for i386?
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list