Re: annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh

• To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh
• From: "Łukasz Jagiełło" <jagiello.lukasz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 13:24:13 +0200
• In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805151221500.16737@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805151207590.16737@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <92d7c0020805150416o759718c8j1d5976d6459d449f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <544eb990805150419i19e9c510o1a9c69cb290ed1d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805151221500.16737@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

2008/5/15 Scott van Looy <scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> Anyone got any ideas why?
>>
>> You appended the rule, AFTER the ones which allow ssh through?
>
> That should work though IIRC...I'm stopping a specific IP from connecting

Put hole INPUT


-- 
Łukasz Jagiełło
lukasz<at>jagiello<dot>org

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

• References:
  • annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh
    • From: Scott van Looy
  • Re: annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh
    • From: Łukasz Jagiełło
  • Re: annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh
    • From: Bill Crawford
  • Re: annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh
    • From: Scott van Looy

• Prev by Date: Re: annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh
• Next by Date: Re: annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh
• Previous by thread: Re: annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh
• Next by thread: Re: annoying brute force attack attempt using ssh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread