On Wednesday 14 May 2008 23:40:35 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 18:20 -0400, Mike Chalmers wrote: > > What do y'all think of KDE 4? It doesn't seem to be as technical as > > KDE 3 to me, I don't like that. The system configuration lacks > > options, I can't figure out how to get things the way that I want > > them, etc. I am not saying that it is not good, though. That maybe it > > just needs more options. > > I'm not sure what you mean by "not as technical", but at the moment KDE4 > does have fewer options than KDE3. However I'm assuming that's because > it's really a beta (despite the name). Expect more goodies in version > 4.1 around July. > > For the moment it's usable, though you have to live with some > limitations, mostly cosmetic as far as I can see. > It really has come on a lot in the last couple of months, and I'm sure it will continue to do so. However, the big issue is learning to do things a different way. I have most of the basic functionality set up the way I like it now, but it took me a while to find out how to do that. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
