Re: So Long and Thanks for All the Fish

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Charles Curley <charlescurley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:49:32PM +0100, Alan Cox
> wrote:
> > > * Related to the last, no simple caching
> software. The last I knew,
> > >   there was no RPM analog to the Debian
> apt-cacher. This caches deb
> > 
> > RPM doesn't need a specialist tool for this
> thankfully. Squid and similar
> > generic caching setups can handle it quite nicely.
> It is true we don't
> > have a package that does that setup in one go (or
> I've not found it
> > anyway).
> 
> An excellent point.
> 
> I don't know how long squid will cache a file; I
> assume that's
> configurable. apt-cache can be called (from cron) to
> purge only
> packages that have been superceded. So you can
> update machine A in
> January, and machine B in March, and if a package
> pulled in in January
> is still the current package machine B will get it
> from the local
> cache.
> 
> Even so, a squid sounds better than my rsync setup.
> 
> 
> > 
> > > * I prefer XFCE or similar lightweight desktops
> for these machines. I
> > >   can get XFCE with xubuntu. I see no Fedora
> analog.
> > 
> > Fedora includes xfce packages, they just aren't
> burned on the standard
> > CDs but are in the yum repository.
> 
> True. Is there an XFCE only installation option?
> Absent an XFCE
> specific CD, that would require network access, and
> likely slow down
> installation time. Neither one is a major obstacle
> for most people in
> rich countries. For folks in poorer countries,
> either one could be a
> show stopper.

Charles,

Rahul wrote the following:
<quote>
Not that it makes a huge difference now but

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-February/msg00005.html

Rahul
</quote>

Take it for a spin if there is still time.  A friend
of mine has two old machines in that situation, but I 
still consider that even Xubuntu will not run on them
old PII with 64 MB ram :(  Tried to boot Slitaz, but
it failed to boot :(, DSL and Austrumi work, but I
cannot get machines to identify the network and
connect.  

Regards,

Antonio 
> 
> > 
> > > * While I am glad to see the Fedora live CDs,
> they are klunky compared
> > >   to the Ubuntu/Knoppix/Finnix live CDs I have
> used. For one thing, on
> > >   shutdown those live CDs will eject the CD and
> wait for you to remove
> > >   them from the drive.
> > 
> > Useful feedback.. hope you get on well with Ubuntu
> 
> Thanks. I'm glad you found it useful.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon
> Campaign
> Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for
> open standards
> and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF
> in email
> http://www.charlescurley.com    / \    No M$ Word
> docs in email
> 
> Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C
> FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
> > -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux