On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > --- Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Antonio Olivares > > <olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On adobe flash, you bring up an interesting > > point, ads > > > are everywhere, if adobe flash is not present, > > you > > > cannot do anything. > > > > You need to start visiting better sites. No good > > website relies on > > flash that heavily. > > Yes, but I have to visit "those sites" otherwise, I > cannot read many messages and posts. I have tried > adblockers, but they make the page load more slowly > and at home, it makes it really a pain in the as* > > > > > > > > If some software is illegal, what will the big > > guys do > > > to a little guy? Will they sue me because I have > > > nonfree stuff? What will they do to me? I can > > see > > > the logic for the big corporations and companies, > > but > > > for the little guys, the home users, it does not > > make > > > much sense. > > > > Who says it has to make sense? Big business sue > > little guys all the time. > You are right :) RIAA rings a bell. Question is why? > do they go after someone who has next to nothing, > instead of others who have more? > Because others who have more, have the resources to tie them up in court for years. Max -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
