Re: f9 vs rawhide question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 19 April 2008, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>Gene Heskett <gene.heskett <at> verizon.net> writes:
>> Since I don't seem to have a path to back this up to pure, uptodate f8, is
>> it safe right now to just let yum update the whole system to rawhide? 
>> That's 1300+ packages, including kde-4.03, which I understand from copying
>> the mail here, will hose kmail, and I have little use for t-bird until it
>> grows some ease of configuration like kmail has had for 5+ years.
>
>The upgrade to KDE 4.0.3 will not hose KMail. The kdepim we are shipping is
>still the same kdepim 3.5.9 you're used to (because kdepim is not included
> in KDE 4.0, it will be in 4.1) and it works just fine in KDE 4.
>
>The issue you may be referring to was purely a dependency issue and is
> already fixed, see:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441541
>
>        Kevin Kofler

No, this problem I'm having doesn't seem to be related.  My problem is that 
make has died.  And since the only thing from rawhide that the new yum pulled 
in was all pieces of rawhide's glibc, that is where I'm pointing my finger.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
	"I thought you were trying to get into shape."
	"I am. The shape I've selected is a triangle."

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux