El sáb, 29-03-2008 a las 12:19 -0600, Arthur Pemberton escribió: > So you're saying a concentrated effort to hack a single machine (only > one with Linux) is an easier test than machines randomly on the > internet operated by noobs who barely know how to change advanced > settings? The arguement is always made that noobs stick with the > defaults, most distro defaults are pretty secure. I'm saying the opposite. It's great they couldn't hack it, but as you say there're loads of machines operated by noobs, so the fact of not being able to hack that machine in the contest doesn't mean that the noobs can feel safer because they run a Linux distro in their servers. Manuel. -- Manuel Arostegui Ramirez. Electronic Mail is not secure, might not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
