Re: What linux lacks most - a decent remote fs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Ian Chapman <packages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Neal Becker wrote:
> > I used unix/linux for many years.  In the past we've used nfs.  But nfsv3
> > has no (useful) authentication.  Anyone can setup a rogue machine and
> > pretend to be any uid/gid.
> 
> What I'd like to see is a way to forcibly unmount broken hard NFS 
> mounts. umount -f seems to do squat.
> 
>

(Sorry about the incomplete prior post--stupid yahoo mail)

I thought that hard NFS mounts were a thing of the past--like the mid '90s.

Isn't it preferred to set them up with an automounter to prevent panic
when communication falters?

I've looked into it a little bit, and it seems like it can be done, but for
the frequency that I use NFS, I took the quick-and-dirty route.

--bk





      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux