RE: EDAC error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rick,

	I have run top, and it shows two processes at 25% they are X and
Gnome. Other than that no processes (other than yum popping up now and
again).

	Thanks Brent

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Stevens
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 3:04 PM
To: For users of Fedora
Subject: Re: EDAC error

Brent Snow, Mr. wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
>  
> 
>             I am having a problem with a new Dell PowerEdge 1900
Server 
> running Fedora 8.
> 
>  
> 
>             The System setup is as follows:
> 
>  
> 
>             2 - Xeon  E5310 (Quad-Core 1.6 GHz) processors
> 
>  
> 
>             16 GB of RAM, I SATA 80 GB HDD.
> 
>  
> 
>             ------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  
> 
>             The Error is as follows: EDAC i5000 MC0: nonfatal errors 
> found 0=800.
> 
>  
> 
>             The system runs very very slow (I have a p3 that is faster

> then this system is).
> 
>  
> 
>             I have installed Windows 2003 Server X_64 and it runs very

> very quick.
> 
>  
> 
>             There are no errors under Windows, and there are no errors

> reported by Dell's diagnostic tools.
> 
>  
> 
>             I have run Memtest86+ (for 96 hours) and there are no
errors 
> detected there as well.
> 
>  
> 
>             As soon as I install Fedora 8, the errors show back up and

> the system just bogs down.
> 
>  
> 
>             I have tried aliasing the EDAC files thinking that this
may 
> be the problem, but all that did was stop the log messages.
> 
>  
> 
>             I have noticed that it seems that each of the processors 
> peaks at 100% for 30 seconds or so and then it will move to another
CPU, 
> for 30 seconds, etc.
> 
>  
> 
>             I am at a loss on this one, and Google has not been able
to 
> provide any answers, so I was hoping that someone else has experienced
this.

Have you run "top" to see what process is sucking up the CPU power?  In
my case, I made the mistake of running pcscd and that ate a LOT of CPU.
A quick "service pcscd stop" restored things to normal.

Before pcscd fans get up in arms, I don't plan to have smartcards on my
systems at this time.  If I do, then I'll investigate it further.  For
now, my problem is solved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer                       rps2@xxxxxxxx -
- Hosting Consulting, Inc.                                           -
-                                                                    -
-    "Hello. My PID is Inigo Montoya.  You `kill -9'-ed my parent    -
-                     process.  Prepare to vi."                      -
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux