2008/3/10, pursley1@xxxxxxxxxxxx <pursley1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I'm sad to say that I also experienced the same problem but not on both > my computers that use Fedora. One did and the other didn't and I had to > re-configure eth0 manually before it would come back up. Sounds like > something's wrong with the update. > > Bradley > > > Antonio M wrote: > > 2008/3/10, John Austin <ja@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > >> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 12:22 +0100, Antonio M wrote: > >> > I have a router with two NIC's. > >> > After this morning updates, definition of network interfaces was > >> > garbled, I found etho.bak and eth1.bak in addition to eth0 and > >> > eth1....but eth0 and eth1 were not activated at boot time, as they > >> > were defined as getting address from a DHCP server. > >> > therefore no internet connection and no DHCP. > >> > I had to reconfigure eth0 and eth1 by hand, delete *.bak files and > >> > restart system > >> > > >> > Anybody else with same problem??? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Antonio Montagnani > >> > Skype : antoniomontag > >> > > >> > >> > >> Hi Antonio > >> > >> Yep - I have had the same problem > >> > >> Also I'm not happy with the latest kernel and am > >> staying with 2.6.23.15-137 for now. > >> > >> John > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> fedora-list mailing list > >> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > >> > >> > > John > > > > 1) do you have a single NIC system or two NIC'S system? > > 2) what is the problem with latest kernel?? > > > > > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > against which component shall we file a bug??? -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag
