Re: Flash for amd64

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Flash for amd64
• From: Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:51:57 +0100
• In-reply-to: <20080302131527.36b2f660@zooty>
• Organization: Crocom Computer Systems
• References: <1204473630.21347.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1204474892.31241.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080302114237.7aaa9d87@zooty> <1204477149.18435.78.camel@fuerte> <20080302131527.36b2f660@zooty>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Dnia 02-03-2008, nie o godzinie 13:15 -0500, Tom Horsley pisze:
> On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:59:09 +0000
> John Austin <ja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-17.fc8.i386
> 
> That one confuses me. Why would 32 bit firefox need
> to use nspluginwrapper?

Security. See http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/15700.html
-- 
Tomasz Torcz

• References:
  • Flash for amd64
    • From: Mike Chambers
  • Re: Flash for amd64
    • From: Gilboa Davara
  • Re: Flash for amd64
    • From: Tom Horsley
  • Re: Flash for amd64
    • From: John Austin
  • Re: Flash for amd64
    • From: Tom Horsley

• Prev by Date: Re: [Ambassadors] who knows somebody at http://openfacts.berlios.de ?
• Next by Date: Re: [Ambassadors] who knows somebody at http://openfacts.berlios.de ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Flash for amd64
• Next by thread: Re: Flash for amd64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread