bravo_elf wrote: > > > Also I've verified if there fglrx driver installed: > > [root@localhost bravo_elf]# rpm -qa|grep fglrx > [root@localhost bravo_elf]# > > It means I have > nothing installed..... so Tim was right about this when he wrote it's > message about installing packages with mistakes. > > Now about my kernel, I almost knew it was i686 too, but what do we need > to now? > > All the updates I download, have an i386 classification. I suppose > it's not only me :))), but all those guys who uses 32bit > systems ;-) :-) > > I didn't clearly understood your explain about i586 and i686. > What I know, is that when I need to DL some linux distro > I need to > look for i386 type(because I have 32 bit pentium IV) > Do i586 and i686 different version for i386? > > Normally the install senses the machine level and sets everything. Your Pentium IV is at the i686 level. It can run i386 code. A lot of code doesn't use any of the more recent instruction capabilities and is designated i386. There can be trouble if some of the libraries get mixed on your system. Did you upgrade thrugh F7? There was an installation bug on the F7 CDs that mixed the i586 kernel and the i686 kernel-devel that was a headache. Look at the file /var/log/rpmpkgs in an editor and see if you have a mixed kernel, kernel-devel install. Since you are executing a i686 kernel the kernel-devel package is the suspect. Robert McBroom -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Re%3A8--ATI-DRIVER-installation-problems---asking-for-help-tp15760188p15773051.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
