Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install
• From: Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:41:11 -0600
• Cc: Ric Moore <wayward4now@xxxxxxxxx>
• In-reply-to: <1203215802.24093.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Organization: Melville Theatre
• References: <20080215232251.990a6db0.theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080216104337.1b30eeb4@core> <BAY143-W24390A254F4DD291F139DA8D270@xxxxxxx> <47B75108.4010104@xxxxxxx> <20080216151328.903943ab.theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1203215802.24093.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:36:42 -0500
Ric Moore <wayward4now@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If you have 2G of memory, would using mem=2G be of any advantage?

I have 4G of memory.  It works when I specify "mem=2G".  It also works when I
specify "mem=4024M" but I don't get a whole 4024mb.

Booting without "mem=" causes it to run amazingly slowly.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install
    • From: Bill Davidsen
  • Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install
    • From: Alexander Dalloz
  • Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install - where is mem= ?
    • From: Timothy Payne

• References:
  • slow (s-l-o-w) install
    • From: Frank Cox
  • Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install
    • From: Alan Cox
  • RE: slow (s-l-o-w) install
    • From: Da Rock
  • Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install
    • From: Bill Davidsen
  • Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install
    • From: Frank Cox
  • Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install
    • From: Ric Moore

• Prev by Date: Re: Encryption on installation
• Next by Date: Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install - where is mem= ?
• Previous by thread: Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install
• Next by thread: Re: slow (s-l-o-w) install - where is mem= ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread