Re: x86_64/i386

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrea Mastellone wrote:
François Patte wrote:

I think that this should *not* be the default unless everything x86_64
and i386 will work in the same way. This is now far from being achieved:
you cannot have all plugins or extensions working in firefox 64bits and
it is better to install i386 versions.

The worse situation is for video (vlc, xine,....) there are a lot of
conflicts between libraries if you install 64bits versions of some
softwares using the same libraries...


Hi,

you are absolutely right. In facts, I have just removed all ?86 packages in a 64 bit system (Fedora 8).

I cannot use no more the following applications (due to the dependence on 32 bit libraries):

- flash plugin from Adobe (workaround: gnash but it works at 40% , not with youtube :( )

- Adobe Reader (not big problem due to evince)

- WMWare Player/Workstation with a 32 bit guest operating system (this is a bit serious shortcoming)

- Skype (ops ! :( )

So, one should consider, before removing 32bit packages, if possible to work without these softwares.

Now, the question: what is the *minimum* number of the ?86 libraries one should install to get them working again ? :)

Remove all i386
Then yum install what you need and it will pull in the i386 equivalents.

On my CentOS box - the i386 packages I needed:

rar (shareware closed source, only i386)
flash plugin
nspluginwrapper
firefox

Including those four packages - 83 packages (most i386 - I think one or two are i686)

Adobe really needs to release an x86_64 flash plugin.
If they did - thanks to icedtea - I would only need rar and what rar needs (and I could probably do w/o that).


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux