On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 18:32 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 19:17 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 20:41 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > > > Les wrote: > > > > Also if Karl doesn't get it, there will be other much more timid folk > > > > who also don't get it. When the answer that Karl understands is added > > > > to the archives, more people benefit than Karl. > > > > If they didn't have to wade through 50 replies in 4-5 threads until the > > Eureka! moment arrived. > ---- > not really...by the time the answer comes into view, the thread has > thoroughly degenerated and parsing through a thread of Karl's is certain > to be an exercise in futility. > > Not to mention my own experience with computer software...every time you > make something idiot proof, along comes a bigger idiot. > > Craig > In my Navy days we called it sailor proof, but the only thing I found that met that criteria was titanium ball bearings (but the race was vulnerable) ;-) Regards, Les H
