On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 05:41 +0000, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:46:38 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > > On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 04:32 +0000, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > >> > evolution packaging includes a schema specifically for evolution > >> > attributes. All LDAP clients have different notions of which > >> > attributes to use which greatly complicates things. > >> > > >> > Craig > >> > >> Where's the evolution schema, > > ---- > > rpm -ql evolution |grep schema > > ---- > >> and how do I use it? > > ---- > > include /etc/openldap/schema/evolution.schema > > > > (assuming that you copy it there) > > > > but the better answer is, if you have to ask, you are not gonna get LDAP > > to work. This clearly is one daemon that doesn't work for you without > > putting in time to figure it out. > > > > Craig > > I did that: > > [root@phoenix ~]# rpm -ql evolution | grep -i schema > /etc/gconf/schemas/apps-evolution-attachment-reminder.schemas > /etc/gconf/schemas/apps-evolution-mail-notification.schemas > /etc/gconf/schemas/apps-evolution-mail-prompts-checkdefault.schemas > /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_evolution_addressbook.schemas > /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_evolution_calendar.schemas > /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_evolution_shell.schemas > /etc/gconf/schemas/bogo-junk-plugin.schemas > /etc/gconf/schemas/evolution-mail.schemas > > None of these seem to be ldap schemas. However, I found > > [root@phoenix ~]# rpm -qil evolution-data-server | grep -i schema/usr/ > share/evolution-data-server-1.12/evolutionperson.schema > > which contains things like: > > # primaryPhone > attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.8506.1.2.1 > NAME 'primaryPhone' > DESC 'preferred phone number used to contact a person' > EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch > SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch > SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 > SINGLE-VALUE ) > > # carPhone > attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.8506.1.2.2 > NAME 'carPhone' > DESC 'car phone telephone number of the person' > EQUALITY telephoneNumberMatch > SUBSTR telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch > SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50 > SINGLE-VALUE ) > etc. > > Is this the schema you are talking about? ---- yes Craig
