Re: Fedora 8 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/22/07, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007 4:15 AM, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 19:30 +0000, Beartooth Sciurivore wrote:
> > > Is there a place we can *read* a transcript, and not have to sit
> > > there listening??
> >
> > After you've heard the first "I don't like how it looks," complaint,
> > you've heard the entire half hour.  They don't like it, and it's mostly
> > about how it looks.
>
>
> You may or may not agree with their conclusions, but it is unfair to
> summarize their review as "I don't like how it looks"
>
>
> --
> Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
> ( www.pembo13.com )
>

I completely agree. You really should listen to them because they
aren't disagreeing with the look, they give some usefull comparisons
and later in the show they explain why Fedora needs a harsh review in
some part and why it is a great product (than can be even better).

Valent.


-- 
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux