Re: [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]

• To: bseklecki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]
• From: "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:02:12 +0000
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <1197473255.16239.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <1197473255.16239.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 12/12/2007, Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does anyone know why Fedora 8 YUM repo is stuck back on Bacula 2.0.3?  I

You could file a RFE at http://bugzilla.redhat.com asking the packager
to update his packages.

• References:
  • [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]
    • From: Brian A. Seklecki

• Prev by Date: Re: [Solved] Re: [FC8] where does gdmsetup hide the "Welcome" text?
• Next by Date: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock
• Previous by thread: [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread