Re: [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: bseklecki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]
From: "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:02:12 +0000
Cc:
In-reply-to: <1197473255.16239.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1197473255.16239.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 12/12/2007, Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does anyone know why Fedora 8 YUM repo is stuck back on Bacula 2.0.3?  I

You could file a RFE at http://bugzilla.redhat.com asking the packager
to update his packages.

References:
- [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]
  - From: Brian A. Seklecki

Prev by Date: Re: [Solved] Re: [FC8] where does gdmsetup hide the "Welcome" text?
Next by Date: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock
Previous by thread: [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]
Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Fedora/CentOS rpms for Bacula 2.2.6 available]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]