Re: [OT] Is Rawhide usable for day-to-day operation - reply when you've time, no hurry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Arijit Sarkar wrote:
> Hi, For the past one year (almost) I am into Linux world. I used
> Ubuntu and then Debian on my desktop before. Recently I've
> installed Fedora 8 into my laptop after hearing lots of good things
> about it. And I found that in many cases Fedora 8 is better than
> Ubuntu 7.04 (frank opinion). No matter how "easy to use" ubuntu
> methods are, I found some interesting learning curves/excitements
> in Fedora. So I choose Fedora for my lenovo N3000.
>
> Now, while using /debian/, I learned about its /testing, unstable/
> branches. Later I successfully switched to "/Testing/" (currently
> '/lenny/') and quite happy to use that. Since it's a home PC, I
> don't mind if sometimes few things break and I've wait for few days
>  for the fixes.
>
> Does Fedora has three branches like debian - /stable, testing,
> unstable/ ? I guess "rawhide" is like "testing" in debian. Am I
> correct? In debian, people thinks that 'testing' distribution is
> almost usable for day-to-day use. Can rawhide be used for the same?
> Is 'debian-testing' and 'fedora-rawhide' comparable? Can I install
> a /rawhide /for my laptop? Can you suggest the move to 'rawhide'
> fedora install.
>
No, rawhide is more like unstable branch in debian.

- -James
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFHVD36kNLDmnu1kSkRAttJAJ9W7ZRwxFTE/Lk2ONG81QznH8DGXACeNClz
QRjIyuupWAT4hyrgj/T9R80=
=9j0x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux