Right. My last reply still applies. On 12/1/07, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Lonni J Friedman wrote: > > 1.0.9639 is rather old, and isn't supported any longer. If this is > > the latest that freshrpms is giving out, then they're out of date, and > > you need to go elsewhere. > > > > On 12/1/07, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I just updated my FC6 server to F8 (replaced not upgraded) and installed > >> the nvidia-x11-drv-96xx driver from Freshrpms which has always worked > >> before and is working right now on my desktop. Both systems are running > >> the 64bit version of Fedora. Below is the make.log file from DKMS: > >> > >> > >>> DKMS make.log for nvidia-1.0.9639-1 for kernel 2.6.23.1-49.fc8 (x86_64) > >>> Sat Dec 1 09:30:13 GMT-6 2007 > >>> > >>> NVIDIA: calling KBUILD... > >>> make CC=cc KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 -C /lib/modules/2.6.23.1-49.fc8/build > >>> SUBDIRS=/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/1.0.9639-1/build modules > >>> test -e include/linux/autoconf.h -a -e include/config/auto.conf || > >>> ( \ > >>> echo; \ > >>> echo " ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid."; \ > >>> echo " include/linux/autoconf.h or > >>> include/config/auto.conf are missing."; \ > >>> echo " Run 'make oldconfig && make prepare' on kernel > >>> src to fix it."; \ > >>> echo; \ > >>> /bin/false) > >>> mkdir -p /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/1.0.9639-1/build/.tmp_versions > >>> rm -f /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/1.0.9639-1/build/.tmp_versions/* > >>> make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/1.0.9639-1/build > >>> cp /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/1.0.9639-1/build/nv-kernel.o > >>> /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/1.0.9639-1/build/nv-kernel.o > >>> cp: cannot stat `/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/1.0.9639-1/build/nv-kernel.o': > >>> No such file or directory > >>> make[3]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/1.0.9639-1/build/nv-kernel.o] Error 1 > >>> make[2]: *** [_module_/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/1.0.9639-1/build] Error 2 > >>> NVIDIA: left KBUILD. > >>> nvidia.ko failed to build! > >>> make[1]: *** [module] Error 1 > >>> make: *** [module] Error 2 > >>> > >> I've never looked at this file before so I don't know what I'm supposed > >> to see but the "cp" command looks funny as it appears to be trying to > >> copy a file onto itself. The module obviously fails to build and X fails > >> to run. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Richard > >> > Sorry, should have said I've got an old Geforce 4 MX card which is not > supported in the newer versions... > > Thanks, > Richard