On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 19:11 +0100, Antonio wrote: > 2007/11/30, Craig White <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 18:10 +0100, Antonio wrote: > > > 2007/11/30, Antonio <antonio.montagnani@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > 2007/11/30, Craig White <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 23:36 +0100, Antonio wrote: > > > > > > 2007/11/29, Mikkel L. Ellertson <mikkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > > Antonio wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To resume: this is my samba.conf file on one computer: > > > > > > > > > # Samba config file created using SWAT > > > # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) > > > # Date: 2007/11/30 00:27:50 > > > > > > [global] > > > server string = Samba Server Version %v > > > security = SHARE > > > passdb backend = tdbsam > > > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > > max log size = 50 > > > wins support = Yes > > > cups options = raw > > > > > > [homes] > > > comment = Home Directories > > > valid users = MYDOMAIN\%S > > > read only = No > > > > > > [printers] > > > comment = All Printers > > > path = /var/spool/samba > > > printable = Yes > > > browseable = No > > > > > > [public] > > > comment = Public Stuff > > > path = /home/antonio > > > read only = No > > > guest ok = Yes > > > > > > This is the output on same computer (logged as anonymous): > > > > > > [antonio@Casa ~]$ smbclient -L Casa -U antonio > > > Password: > > > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a-6.fc8] > > > > > > Sharename Type Comment > > > --------- ---- ------- > > > homes Disk Home Directories > > > public Disk Public Stuff > > > IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server Version > > > 3.0.26a-6.fc8) > > > ML-1610 Printer Samsung ML-1610 > > > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a-6.fc8] > > > > > > Server Comment > > > --------- ------- > > > CASA Samba Server Version 3.0.26a-6.fc8 > > > > > > Workgroup Master > > > --------- ------- > > > WORKGROUP CASA > > > > > > I find the command not very reactive, I mean that there is some lag > > > before Password line appears and there is also a stop after sharename > > > section is written... > > > > > > But if I issue same command from another computer (Acer) I get : > > > smbclient -L Casa -U antonio > > > Connection to Casa failed (Error NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME) > > > [antonio@acer ~]$ smbclient -L Acer -U antonio > > > Password: > > > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a-6.fc8] > > > > > > Sharename Type Comment > > > --------- ---- ------- > > > homes Disk Home Directories > > > musica Disk > > > IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server Version > > > 3.0.26a-6.fc8) > > > ML-1610 Printer ML-1610 > > > LaserJet_1200 Printer LaserJet_1200 > > > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a-6.fc8] > > > > > > Server Comment > > > --------- ------- > > > ACER Samba Server Version 3.0.26a-6.fc8 > > > > > > Workgroup Master > > > --------- ------- > > > WORKGROUP ACER > > > Connection to Casa failed (ERROR NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME) > > > > > > smbclient -L Casa -U antonio > > > Connection to Casa failed (Error NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME) > > > [antonio@acer ~]$ smbclient -L Acer -U antonio > > > Password: > > > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a-6.fc8] > > > > > > Sharename Type Comment > > > --------- ---- ------- > > > homes Disk Home Directories > > > musica Disk > > > IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server Version > > > 3.0.26a-6.fc8) > > > ML-1610 Printer ML-1610 > > > LaserJet_1200 Printer LaserJet_1200 > > > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a-6.fc8] > > > > > > Server Comment > > > --------- ------- > > > ACER Samba Server Version 3.0.26a-6.fc8 > > > > > > Workgroup Master > > > --------- ------- > > > WORKGROUP ACER > > > > > > on both computer, I would expect that in Resources/Network/Windows > > > network I should see at least the computer that I am using.... > > ---- > > firewall blocking ports 139 and/or 445 on CASA/ACER ? > > > > Craig > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > if I change security from SHARES to USERS it seems to be working... ---- sorry...I stopped reading your configurations security = share is almost pointless and should be avoided and would be deprecated if Jerry Carter had his way. It's an emulation of Windows 95/98 sharing and it doesn't support the same features at all, as you noticed. Craig
