On 25/11/2007, Karl Larsen <k5di@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Chris Jones wrote: > > > >> That sounds like a writer with Debian experience and a feeling Apt > >> is easier than RPM. There are some things in RPM that are quite odd. > >> I think Apt is a simpler method. I have ubuntu-7.10 loaded and it > >> uses Apt and it seems to update as well as RPM. > > > > It is not really correct to compare apt to rpm, a better comparison > > would be to compare apt to yum (or at a lower level rpm to dpkg). > > > > Chris > > > Yes your right. I am going to reload my ubuntu and see if the first > cut is a flook. I loaded it and it gave me the crooked image on my > screen. Then the screen went blank for about 30 minutes it seemed like > but really about 4 minutes. Then up came a real looking almost perfect > image just like it looked after installing. I seems to know about Nvidia > and does the right thing. > > If the thing is real then the ubuntu loader is smarter than > anaconda. And it is still just one CD-rom :-) > On my ATI laptop, the latest Fedoras (>=6) will not give me a GUI if I install with Anaconda. The Ubuntu installer gets it right almost every time. And it is still just one CD-rom :-) Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
