On Nov 8, 2007 8:47 AM, Strong <strong_yethumble@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08 Nov 2007 10:47:35 -0500 DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think that it might be a good idea to increase the time > > > between Fedora releases and/or make the lifetime of every > > > release at least 2-3 years. > > > > That's what RHEL and CentOS are for. > > Yes, but they use not so up-to-date software as F! Why not satisfy > Serguei Miridonov thought? What a mystery is there with the > lifetime/release period of F? Why some speak F needs shorter > lifetime/release period just to be on "edge"? - the thing I keep try to > find out not the first time. Try Ubuntu. They have long term versions. You get the "bleeding-edge" when that version is released. However, I don't believe that the long term support versions keep all the packages on the "edge". It just does not work that way. What long term support versions provides are security fixes and bug fixes. No new features are added over time.
