On 11/3/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Karl Larsen wrote: > > > Konstantin Svist wrote: > > > > So, PLEASE, make sure that any new message that you write to the list is > > > either: > > > * a reply to an already-established thread of conversation (without changing > > > the subject line), > > > * or the message is self-contained, preferably with a descriptive subject > > > > > > The message I'm replying to is VERY confusing, and it takes a lot > > > of time to understand what you're talking about. > > > The message had 2 subjects. There were two lines of words. I > > could have put the whole of the work Maxwell did with wave theory. > > Would this be better? > > god help us all, karl doesn't even know what a "subject" is. > > rday > > p.s. yes, karl, i'm "stupid." i figured i might as well just get > that over with to save you the trouble of posting it yourself. There in lies the danger of lowering the bar of entry into Linux. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
