Re: F7 repo contains the packages that its install dvd has not. Why?

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: F7 repo contains the packages that its install dvd has not. Why?
• From: Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:56:54 -0700
• In-reply-to: <1193291519.6535.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <20071025042323.0ed33094@localhost> <1193274268.6535.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071025011932.GX4413@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1193291519.6535.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 22:51 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
> A surprisingly small amount of this appears to be duplication of
> 32-bit libraries and applications, [...]

I meant to say "surprisingly large" there. That's slightly more than
half of the entire 32-bit repository duplicated into the x86_64 tree.
Wow. T_T
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: F7 repo contains the packages that its install dvd has not. Why?
    • From: Todd Zullinger

• References:
  • F7 repo contains the packages that its install dvd has not. Why?
    • From: Strong
  • Re: F7 repo contains the packages that its install dvd has not. Why?
    • From: Peter Gordon
  • Re: F7 repo contains the packages that its install dvd has not. Why?
    • From: Todd Zullinger
  • Re: F7 repo contains the packages that its install dvd has not. Why?
    • From: Peter Gordon

• Prev by Date: Re: Jave Run Time for Fedora 7 - where from?
• Next by Date: Re: [OT] Re: New horizon's
• Previous by thread: Re: F7 repo contains the packages that its install dvd has not. Why?
• Next by thread: Re: F7 repo contains the packages that its install dvd has not. Why?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread