On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 09:16 -0700, Alan M. Evans wrote: > GRUB's faulty terminology or not, any documentation should make the > meaning more clear, not less. Is it really faulty, or just different from your perspective? I don't think the GRUB documentation is *that* bad. This is merely a chroot situation. i.e. *This* has its own root, and *that* has its own, but different, root. -- [tim@bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 i686 i386 Using FC 4, 5, 6 & 7, plus CentOS 5. Today, it's FC7. Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
