On 10/18/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > Well it would be nice if you diccuss one topic at a time, fedora > > updates is one matter, and SELinux history is another. > > You can't separate them unless you can describe the process someone > would use to get one without the other. It's a package deal. I'll be back to respond properly, but please explain how we cannot get "fedora _distro_ updates being non trivial" without "SELinux - pros/cons" (i know this isn't your exact phrasing) -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
