On 10/18/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > Nothing warranting the kind of flaming that is going on. I've been > > using SELinux when appropriate for years now. > > I think the real missing piece here is a good definition of > 'appropriate' in this context (SELinux as delivered in fedora). What > situation warrants the extra trouble of managing it, yet can deal with > the general unstability and update frequency of the distribution? 1) Desktop/workstations on the open internet 2) Testing for production system to be deployed on RHEL 3) Soon... general usage -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
