sam wrote:
no john..
unless i missed one of your posts, you didn't outline what was wrong. if you
did, could you repost as i'm missing some of this thread.
Then read the archive.
as far as the masquerade, i would suggest you google. there are plenty of
sites using it, suggesting it. there are plenty of people on various
forums/channels mentioning it as well...
so, if you have specific knowledge of why it's wrong, share, or in the words
of a friend of mine.. shut the f* up...
[a]<--->[router] <---> [b]
If you want a to contact b and b to contact a, the masquerading prevents it.
If you masq a, a looks to b like the router.
Note, a and b are often networks.
peace..
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Summerfield
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 5:00 PM
To: For users of Fedora
Subject: Re: Running Wireless and Wired eth connections at the same time
John Summerfield wrote:
sam wrote:
hey john..
since you've stated that what i did was "usually" wrong, and what i did,
happened to be what a number of other people on other sites have done,
why
don't you give details, examples, theory as to why it's wrong. also,
provide
a better solution, along with the theory/rationale as to why your
approach
is more stable, more secure, etc...
Because you don't pay me enough. If you want to be spoon-fed, then i
want to be paid.
I should also mention I outlined the basics in this thread already.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please do not reply off-list
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please do not reply off-list
