RE: iptables versus hosts denied

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





-----Original Message-----
From:	fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Ashley M. Kirchner
Sent:	Tue 10/16/2007 12:10 PM
To:	For users of Fedora Core releases
Cc:	
Subject:	iptables versus hosts denied

    In terms of performance and when a packet is dropped or denied, 
what's best to use?  iptables or hosts.deny ?  Let's assume for a moment 
here that one has a very long list of IP ranges that are being blocked, 
would using iptables to deny the ranges work better/faster than having 
hosts.deny block them?  Just wondering ...

-----------------------------

iptables will drop the packet at the kernel level.

An application with tcp_wrapper support will consult the hosts.allow and hosts.deny files to determine whether or not to accept a TCP connection.

I would expect that iptables would be faster since the work is being done within the kernel.

<<winmail.dat>>


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux