on 10/15/2007 3:28 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Res wrote: >> Edwad, I wont see your racist reply so dont bother replying... >> >> But the last 2 lines sort of sums it up as to why... >> >> ~$ host -t txt 121.27.70.203.no-more-funn.moensted.dk >> 121.27.70.203.no-more-funn.moensted.dk descriptive text "seed.net.tw. >> Dynamic IP or generic rDNS. Use your ISPs mail service, or whitelist at: >> http://moensted.dk/spam/no-more-funn/?addr=203.70.27.121 based on >> reverse dns samples 1016924400"121.27.70.203.no-more-funn.moensted.dk >> descriptive text "TW does not seem to care about spam see >> http://moensted.dk/spam/no-more-funn/?addr=203.70.27.121 1175071330 #" > > It is too bad that moensted.dk is using outdated information. If one goes > to http://www.robtex.com/rbl.html and inputs that IP address they will find > that only moensted.dk blacklists that IP address. > > I suppose it is good that your single IP address of an "ISP" selects that > site as your RBL checker. > >> 93% of the spam that manages to get past RBL's for the past several years >> has been all from TW and CN, both are blocked for ever because of it. >> >> TW/CN in an avg of one day send more spam into this country (based on >> the several domains I control, which are less blocking restrictive as >> they are paying customer accounts, only governed by 5 RBLs that mostly >> block TW/CN anyway <G>) than RR/Shaw/swbell all put together. >> >> I also know that many of your ex-countrymen in the U.S also do same, call >> us what you want, I (I'm sure like them) dont give a fuck, if it stops >> the spam that emits from your country into our networks, totally all for >> it, and there will be no hesitation of blocking other countries that get >> out of control either, if your country ever introduces serious anti-spam >> laws >> essentially making your ISP's get off their asses and clean things up, >> I'm sure the blocking policy will be gladly revisted and lifted, the >> same about CN. >> >> I'm sure youll 'chest beat' with a response but again it wont bother me as >> any reply to me is futile with the several filters to catch anything >> from you (amongst others) or contains a post of yours (inline quoted >> etc) into /dev/null, but I always keep my word, I told you i'd look into >> it and I have. > > I hope you block the US as well. > >> be gone... > > While you won't hear/read what myself and others are saying (hard to take > the truth) I believe some of us will respond to what you have to say in this > forum so as to counteract your statements. Too bad you won't be able to > respond. :-) That was cold Ed. Really cold. ;-) -- David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
