Re: OT Re: mplayer without libmp3lame support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



on 10/15/2007 3:28 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Res wrote:
>> Edwad, I wont see your racist reply so dont bother replying...
>>
>> But the last 2 lines sort of sums it up as to why...
>>
>> ~$ host -t txt 121.27.70.203.no-more-funn.moensted.dk
>> 121.27.70.203.no-more-funn.moensted.dk descriptive text "seed.net.tw.
>> Dynamic IP or generic rDNS. Use your ISPs mail service, or whitelist at:
>> http://moensted.dk/spam/no-more-funn/?addr=203.70.27.121 based on
>> reverse dns samples 1016924400"121.27.70.203.no-more-funn.moensted.dk
>> descriptive text "TW does not seem to care about spam see
>> http://moensted.dk/spam/no-more-funn/?addr=203.70.27.121  1175071330 #"
> 
> It is too bad that moensted.dk is using outdated information.  If one goes
> to http://www.robtex.com/rbl.html and inputs that IP address they will find
> that only moensted.dk blacklists that IP address.
> 
> I suppose it is good that your single IP address of an "ISP" selects that
> site as your RBL checker.
> 
>> 93% of the spam that manages to get past RBL's for the past several years
>> has been all from TW and CN, both are blocked for ever because of it.
>>
>> TW/CN in an avg of one day send more spam into this country (based on
>> the several domains I control, which are less blocking restrictive as
>> they are paying customer accounts, only governed by 5 RBLs that mostly
>> block TW/CN anyway <G>) than  RR/Shaw/swbell all put together.
>>
>> I also know that many of your ex-countrymen in the U.S also do same, call
>> us what you want, I (I'm sure like them) dont give a fuck, if it stops
>> the spam that emits from your country into our networks, totally all for
>> it, and there will be no hesitation of blocking other countries that get
>> out of control either, if your country ever introduces serious anti-spam
>> laws
>> essentially making your ISP's get off their asses and clean things up,
>> I'm sure the blocking policy will be gladly revisted and lifted, the
>> same about CN.
>>
>> I'm sure youll 'chest beat' with a response but again it wont bother me as
>> any reply to me is futile with the several filters to catch anything
>> from you (amongst others) or contains a post of yours (inline quoted
>> etc) into /dev/null, but I always keep my word, I told you i'd look into
>> it and I have.
> 
> I hope you block the US as well.
> 
>> be gone...
> 
> While you won't hear/read what myself and others are saying (hard to take
> the truth) I believe some of us will respond to what you have to say in this
> forum so as to counteract your statements.  Too bad you won't be able to
> respond.  :-)


That was cold Ed. Really cold.  ;-)


-- 

  David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux