Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 40, Issue 264

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 3:13 AM
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 40, Issue 264


> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Selinux so badly corrupted machine can't start (Tony Nelson)
>   2. Re: yum, rpm, pirut, pup won't run on FC6 (Tony Nelson)
>   3. Re: Totem on FC6 (Nigel Henry)
>   4. Re: Gcc problem on FC6 (Les)
>   5. Re: Gcc problem on FC6 (Andrew Overholt)
>   6. Re: Brief diary of an F-7 installation (Rahul Sundaram)
>   7. Re: Partition neatness and order question ? (kwhiskerz)
>   8. Re: tons of spam (jdow)
>   9. Where does chkconfig store its settings? (Eric)
>  10. Re: tons of spam (jdow)
>  11. Re: How can it be? (Timothy Murphy)
>  12. Re: Totem on FC6 (Les Mikesell)
>  13. Re: Brief diary of an F-7 installation (Andras Simon)
>  14. Re: Where does chkconfig store its settings? (Jay Goodman)
>  15. Print odd-even pages (Chu Jeang Tan)
>  16. Re: Selinux so badly corrupted machine can't start
>      (Daniel J Walsh)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:33:35 -0400
> From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Selinux so badly corrupted machine can't start
> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <p04330100c29dcc16030f@[192.168.123.162]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> At 11:30 AM -0400 6/19/07, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>Tony Nelson wrote:
>>> At 9:55 AM -0400 6/19/07, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> ...
>>>> autorelabel=1 (Does the same thing as touch /.autorelabel; reboot)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.  How about adding that last one to
>>> <http://danwalsh/livehournal.com/3144.html> ?
>>>
>>I just posted a new blog entry.
> 
> The string "autorelabel=1" does not show up in
> <http://danwalsh/livehournal.com/3144.html> after refreshing.  There is
> still only one instance of the word "autorelabel".  If you've put the word
> on a different page, I didn't find it.
> -- 
> ____________________________________________________________________
> TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:32:59 -0400
> From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: yum, rpm, pirut, pup won't run on FC6
> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <p04330101c29dcd8759df@[192.168.123.162]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> At 12:05 PM -0400 6/19/07, Eric wrote:
>>At 10:59 AM 6/19/2007, Tony Nelson wrote:
>>
>><TN>>>>>The output from lsof includes the command.  Some RPM-using thing is
>>running.<<<<<
>>
>>Oh, yeah, so it is... an instance of rpmq is running.
>>
>>Killed that, and the __db* files went away.
>>
>>Ran rpm --rebuilddb, which promptly went to sleep, and it's still running
>>(sleeping) after about 5 minutes... will let it run for a while longer
>>before taking the when-all-else-fails step (rebooting).
> ...
> 
> `top` will tell you if it is sleeping or thinking, though it can't tell
> productive work from spinning wheels.
> -- 
> ____________________________________________________________________
> TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:34:54 +0200
> From: Nigel Henry <cave.dnb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Totem on FC6
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <200706192034.54084.cave.dnb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> On Tuesday 19 June 2007 14:33, Christian Menzel wrote:
>> Karl,
>>
>> I have not found a single file totem was able to play, so remove it and use
>> vlc.
>>
>> Chris
> 
> Same goes here, and the same for KDE's Kaboodle. You click on a file, the 
> player opens, and does zilch.
> 
> By contrast, and this is the first time I've tried vlc, and I've installed it 
> on Debian Lenny, as I've mentioned to Karl, but this seems to work even 
> easier than Mplayer.
> 
> One question about vlc. The images are quite dark, and I can't find any sort 
> of config for brightness/contrast, etc. Any suggestions?
> 
> Nigel.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:35:52 -0700
> From: Les <hlhowell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Gcc problem on FC6
> To: hlhowell@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1182278152.9755.43.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> My wife interrupted me.... at least that is my excuse.  Sorry, make it
> Peter, not Phillip. Please forgive me.
> 
> Regards,
> Les H
> On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 11:29 -0700, Les wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:20 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 21:59 -0700, Les wrote:
>> > > /tmp/cc2fblEI.o: In function `main':
>> > > GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x1e): undefined reference to `XOpenDisplay'
>> > > GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x102): undefined reference to
>> > > `XCreateSimpleWindow'
>> > > GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x11f): undefined reference to `XSelectInput'
>> > > GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x131): undefined reference to `XMapWindow'
>> > > GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x153): undefined reference to `XCreateGC'
>> > > GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x16f): undefined reference to `XSetForeground'
>> > > GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x181): undefined reference to `XNextEvent'
>> > > GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x1c4): undefined reference to `XDrawLine'
>> > > GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x1cf): undefined reference to `XFlush'
>> > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> > > make: *** [GuiExample] Error 1
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > These look like linker errors; make sure you have the libX11-devel
>> > package installed and that your CXXFLAGS setting (if needed) includes
>> > the "-lX11" switch so that the linker can properly find the right shared
>> > library to link to.
>> > 
>> > > [...]
>> > > but that would mean that the standard loader execution is messed up,
>> > > because it should look in /usr/lib for the associated ".a" files that
>> > > match the headers.
>> > 
>> > As an aside, Fedora's policy as I understand it is to explicitly exclude
>> > such static libraries from the packaging unless otherwise absolutely
>> > necessary. Once you install libX11-devel, you'll see various libX11.so
>> > symlinks in your /usr/lib directory (or /usr/lib64 if using a 64-bit
>> > arch). These are how the dynamic linker finds the appropriate library.
>> > 
>> > Hope that helped.
>> I appreciate your help Peter.  
>> 
>> I was sort of expecting that when I loaded the Eclipse environment that
>> it would bring along all the setup to use it.  I did have to add the
>> link to the java JRE for it to run, and I got past that hurdle, then
>> came to this one.  I decided to simplify by trying first gcc and then
>> make -k, So here I am.
>> Here is what happened when I tried installing libX11-devel:
>> # yum install libX11-devel
>> Loading "fedorakmod" plugin
>> Loading "installonlyn" plugin
>> Setting up Install Process
>> Setting up repositories
>> Reading repository metadata in from local files
>> Excluding Packages in global exclude list
>> Finished
>> Parsing package install arguments
>> Nothing to do
>> 
>> 
>> So just to prove that this didn't change anything I tried:
>> gcc -L X11 GuiExample.cpp
>> /tmp/ccOzTvpe.o: In function `main':
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x1e): undefined reference to `XOpenDisplay'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x102): undefined reference to
>> `XCreateSimpleWindow'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x11f): undefined reference to `XSelectInput'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x131): undefined reference to `XMapWindow'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x153): undefined reference to `XCreateGC'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x16f): undefined reference to `XSetForeground'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x181): undefined reference to `XNextEvent'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x1c4): undefined reference to `XDrawLine'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x1cf): undefined reference to `XFlush'
>> /tmp/ccOzTvpe.o:(.eh_frame+0x11): undefined reference to
>> `__gxx_personality_v0'
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> 
>> And then I tried this:
>>  yum whatprovides libX11.so
>> Loading "fedorakmod" plugin
>> Loading "installonlyn" plugin
>> Setting up repositories
>> Reading repository metadata in from local files
>> Excluding Packages in global exclude list
>> Finished
>> Importing additional filelist information
>> filelists.xml.gz          100% |=========================| 1.2 MB
>> 00:08     
>> dries     : ################################################## 3540/3540
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> libX11.i386                              1.0.3-4.fc6
>> core            
>> Matched from:
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0
>> libX11.so.6
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> libX11-devel.i386                        1.0.3-4.fc6
>> core            
>> Matched from:
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> libX11.i386                              1.0.3-4.fc6
>> core            
>> Matched from:
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0
>> libX11.so.6
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> nx.i386                                  2.1.0-22.fc6
>> extras          
>> Matched from:
>> /usr/lib/nx/libX11.so.6
>> /usr/lib/nx/libX11.so.6.2
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> libX11.i386                              1.0.3-7.fc6
>> updates         
>> Matched from:
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0
>> libX11.so.6
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> libX11.i386                              1.0.3-7.fc6
>> updates         
>> Matched from:
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0
>> libX11.so.6
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> libX11-devel.i386                        1.0.3-7.fc6
>> updates         
>> Matched from:
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> libX11.i386                              1.0.3-7.fc6
>> installed       
>> Matched from:
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0
>> libX11.so.6
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> libX11-devel.i386                        1.0.3-7.fc6
>> installed       
>> Matched from:
>> /usr/lib/libX11.so
>> 
>> 
>> next I did
>> ls -al libX11*
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      15 Apr 12 09:35 libX11.so -> libX11.so.6.2.0
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      15 Apr 12 09:34 libX11.so.6 ->
>> libX11.so.6.2.0
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1057916 Apr  9 15:12 libX11.so.6.2.0
>> 
>> so it looks like libX11.so is installed in /usr/lib. But:
>> 
>> gcc -LlibX11.so GuiExample.cpp
>> /tmp/cccbDnur.o: In function `main':
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x1e): undefined reference to `XOpenDisplay'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x102): undefined reference to
>> `XCreateSimpleWindow'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x11f): undefined reference to `XSelectInput'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x131): undefined reference to `XMapWindow'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x153): undefined reference to `XCreateGC'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x16f): undefined reference to `XSetForeground'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x181): undefined reference to `XNextEvent'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x1c4): undefined reference to `XDrawLine'
>> GuiExample.cpp:(.text+0x1cf): undefined reference to `XFlush'
>> /tmp/cccbDnur.o:(.eh_frame+0x11): undefined reference to
>> `__gxx_personality_v0'
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> 
>> I then tried going to the add/remove software panel and adding more
>> libraries associated with development, but I was pretty sure I had the
>> required stuff, and sure enough it didn't change anything.
>> 
>> I am sorry, and this is probably clear to some of you, but I am at a
>> loss to understand why this doesn't work.  If I use gcc, the presence or
>> absence of a library .a or .so shouldn't matter since the compiler
>> should create the link chain based on the extern definition, which could
>> be resolved at load time.  Of course if I wanted to debug the code
>> statically, I would need the ".a" version of the library, but I don't
>> want that in this case.  I have downloaded and read the gcc manual, and
>> perused the man pages for both gcc and make.  
>> 
>> Moreover the -L argument to gcc only invokes some printout of the
>> sym-link-times, which is not useful in this context.  Make tries to
>> interpret the -L instead of passing it to link or ld function, so it
>> simply doesn't change anything.  I know that make should have (does
>> have) a means to pass arguments to the link and ld processes, I haven't
>> gotten past the generic compile bit yet using gcc.
>> 
>> I can try to manually create a local make file, but due to my lapse in
>> time using make, I will a have to research that a bit first, and I am
>> not even sure that doing that will cure the problem.
>> 
>> I understand if there is a problem with linking, but I don't understand
>> why I have the cpp errors.
>> 
>> I have also removed the #include for the Xlib.h file and that gave me
>> more errors, which confirms that the compiler is finding the Xlib.h.  I
>> also checked the Xlib.h file and found that the procedures named in the
>> error all seem to have templates.  So when the compiler gives me an
>> undefined reference, typically I believe that it is due to a missing
>> header file, but that is not the case here.  I feel so stupid right now.
>> I have used C for ages, but for the last 15 years I have had my
>> environment setup on Sun and just used it.  When I retired, I wasn't
>> smart enough to save the details of how I had set it all up.  Where is
>> that notebook entry when you need it???  Oh, the one I forgot to
>> write!!!!
>> 
>> I am using the predefined "everything including the kitchen sink" make
>> file, and I can't even find that file to use as an example.  The make
>> documentation I retrieved doesn't mention the location of the basic make
>> template file, and I wanted to use that to begin designing a local make
>> to see if I could code my way out of this in the make file. This is
>> where the modification to the CXXFLAGS environmental variable should go
>> anyway for X programs.  I will look online for another make example to
>> see if I can find one to cobble up for this little exercise.  But any
>> further help you might offer will be greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> Thanks for your help so far, Phillip.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Les H
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:29:56 -0400
> From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Gcc problem on FC6
> To: hlhowell@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1182277796.4821.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 11:29 -0700, Les wrote:
>> I was sort of expecting that when I loaded the Eclipse environment
>> that
>> it would bring along all the setup to use it.  I did have to add the
>> link to the java JRE for it to run, 
> 
> Sorry, I missed the earlier part of this thread - what wasn't as you
> expected with Eclipse?
> 
> Andrew
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20070619/c04cb842/attachment.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:07:46 +0530
> From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Brief diary of an F-7 installation
> To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <4678227A.7010107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
> 
>> I'm pretty sure the Anaconda/Fedora developers
>> have a political preference for Gnome over KDE,
>> and so make it more difficult to choose KDE.
>> I think people should have a free choice.
> 
> I think you have a political preference against Anaconda developers and 
> assuming their motivations without asking them is rather rude. Just stop 
> doing that. Users always have the "free choice" to select "customize 
> now" in the installation.
> 
> Rahul
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:54:32 -0600
> From: kwhiskerz <kwhiskerz@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Partition neatness and order question ?
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <200706191254.32223.kwhiskerz@xxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> On June 19, 2007 10:49:27 Jeff Voskamp wrote:
>> William Case wrote:
>> > Hi;
>> >
>> > Over the last 3 Fedora installs, I have managed to get my partition
>> > numbers out of sequence.
>> >
>> > parted /dev/sdb returns:
>> > Number  Start   End     Size    Type      File system  Flags
>> >  1      8225kB  41.1GB  41.1GB  extended               lba
>> >  5      8258kB  90.5MB  82.2MB  logical   ext3         boot
>> >  6      90.5MB  1349MB  1258MB  logical   linux-swap
>> >  7      1349MB  9739MB  8390MB  logical   ext3
>> >  8      9739MB  30.6GB  20.9GB  logical   ext3
>> >  9      30.6GB  41.1GB  10.5GB  logical   fat32
>> >
>> > Starting correctly with number 1 (sdb1) then jumps to 5 (sdb5).  How can
>> > I rename my partitions so that they go in sequence; sdb1, sdb2, ...
>> > sdb6.
>> >
>> > This is simply a neatness fetish; the numbering is not presently causing
>> > any problems to the actual opeation of F-7.  Am I best just to leave it
>> > alone, or is there a simple way or program that can re-number these
>> > partitions?
>>
>> Partitions 1-4 are primary partitions defined in the partition table in
>> sector 1 of the disk.
>> Partitions 5 and up are logical partitions residing inside the extended
>> partition.
>> You can't simply renumber the partitions since you'd have to pull some
>> out of the extended partition. However, using something like Partition
>> Magic you could possibly shrink one or more of the larger ones, create
>> partitions 2-4, copy over the contents and delete some of the higher
>> numbered ones.  It would take a while and not really buy you anything,
>> other than the nice numbering. :-)
>>
>> Jeff Voskamp
> 
> Actually, you can reorder the number very nicely with fdisk. Go into the 
> advanced settings, x, and type f to fix the partition order. make sure to 
> adjust fstab!
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:55:51 -0700
> From: "jdow" <jdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: tons of spam
> To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <0ade01c7b2a3$78a71e20$0225a8c0@wednesday>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=response
> 
> From: "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
>> On 6/17/07, George <gasjr4wd@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> wow guys,
>>> I've been signed up for this list for about a week and I've noticed a
>>> ton of spam coming in now. I guess I should have used a different
>>> address than my main one... I could stand the traffic, (and this is a
>>> high traffic list!) but all the spam, no way.
>> 
>> 
>> Have you googled your email address? The only hit related to fedora is
>> this thread, but your email address is already in search engines.
> 
> I'll say his address is on Google in spades. He has an E-Bay account,
> or somebody does with that username. I got 61 hits on Google.
> 
> {^_^}
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:55:38 -0400
> From: Eric <spamsink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Where does chkconfig store its settings?
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <6.2.1.2.2.20070619143111.05a79760@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> 
> 
> Where do chkconfig and system-config-services store their settings?
> 
> I checked the man pages and Google and no luck, then tried making a change 
> to chkconfig and running "find / -mmin 10", and nothing obvious showed up.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:02:04 -0700
> From: "jdow" <jdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: tons of spam
> To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <0ae001c7b2a4$56a73d90$0225a8c0@wednesday>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=response
> 
> From: "David G. Miller" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> "jdow" <jdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I may have some "sharp words" about the spam fighting tools that come 
>>> with
>>> FC7. I have little time to play with it. And it does not like my laptop.
>>> So I have to download a bunch of debug files so I can track it down. (The
>>> bug is in X-Windows so the gnome based folks want me to download and
>>> install an unknown number of gnome debug files. Go figure. When I have
>>> time I will humor them. But it's hard as heck to debug a frozen machine
>>> that has kicked the display out the window, metaphorically speaking. The
>>> SpamAssassin RPMS that came with FC4 and FC5 seemed to be incomplete when
>>> I attempted to use them in the past. And for an effective SpamAssassin
>>> install SOME mention of the Spam Assassin Rules Emporium is properly
>>> required, as is mention of FuzzyOCR and a couple other gems.
>>>
>>> (SARE is so effective it was included in the massive DDoS attack that
>>> struck Spamhaus as well. Some spammer got REALLY peaved, po' baby.)
>> If you run your own mail server, I've had good luck with dSpam.  It takes 
>> a little while to get it trained since it's Bayesian filter based but I 
>> now get overall accuracy of over 95% and the spam identification is over 
>> 93%.  I should add that I get *very few* false positives (currently 12 out 
>> of over 15,000 e-mails) and several of those were right after installation 
>> when the filter had very little data to go on.
> 
> Wow - at THAT level it'd get chucked with extreme prejudice. (Since it
> is not actively evil I'd not give in the paraffin and lead foil wraps
> followed by a staking and burial at midnight of a full Moon. But I would
> put it on a disk and bury the disk.) That accuracy is horrible. If I cut
> my spam catch percentage to about 99% or so I could virtually eliminate
> my false alarm rate. But that's not worth the effort tuning the system.
> It ain't broke so I am not going to fix it. I'm serious that when I had
> the 250-300 spam a day spam traffic I'd go one to two weeks without a
> false alarm, once I found some juju to handle technical mailing lists
> that have patch files cross the list frequently.
> 
> SpamAssassin can be awkward to setup. But once setup it is devastatingly
> effective, especially since it scores block lists. No one block list
> will give you a false positive. But they do save a lot of spam sneak-
> throughs. I'm quite convinced that a proper anti-spam tool combines
> rules and Bayes.
> 
> {^_^} 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:38:21 +0100
> From: Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: How can it be?
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <f597qu$jbc$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Chris Jones wrote:
> 
>> It doesn't change the fact that most people have no problems with Fedora
>> at all.
> 
> I think that is very improbable.
> I imagine that a large proportion (like 90%) of Fedora users 
> will try either viewing DVDs or running Skype,
> and in either case they are almost certain to meet problems.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Timothy Murphy  
> e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
> tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
> s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 12
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:07:11 -0500
> From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Totem on FC6
> To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <4678295F.9000302@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Karl Larsen wrote:
> 
>>> If you're happy to run patent encumbered software then you can 
>>> configure the livna repository by installing the rpm at:
>>>
>>> http://rpm.livna.org/livna-release-6.rpm
>>>
>>> ..and then run
>>>
>>> yum install totem-xine
>>>
>>> ..to install a version of totem which can play DVDs.
>>>
>> Hi but one problem. When I try to yum install totem-xine it farts around 
>> and errors out saying the installed totem is in the way. So tried to rpm 
>> -e totem but libs are not removed because they are used for other 
>> software packages.
>> 
>>    What now?
> 
> Back up a step.  Have you installed any other 3rd party RPMS (i.e. not 
> from core/extras/livna)?  If so, I'd remove them or start with a fresh 
> install.  Livna rarely if ever replaces or conflicts with anything in 
> the stock distribution - and in fact requires it to resolve yum 
> dependencies.  The other 3rd party repositories make an effort to be 
> compatible with the base and each other but don't always succeed.  I'd 
> use them only if necessary.  And, as others have already mentioned, vlc 
> will play about anything you throw at it.
> 
> -- 
>   Les Mikesell
>    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:11:25 +0200
> From: "Andras Simon" <szajmi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Brief diary of an F-7 installation
> To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <9008cd5d0706191211o2dca5bb0yd1684565bb9aa8a0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> On 6/19/07, Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Andras Simon wrote:
>>
>> >> 2. There should be an honest choice given between Gnome and KDE.
>> >> There is something sneaky about the way Fedora tries to get Gnome in.
>> >
>> > I remember being offered the option to install Gnome, KDE or a third
>> > DTE (Xfce?). I chose none, and got it :-) Which, btw is a definite
>> > improvement over older RH/Fedora installs. So I don't see any Gnome
>> > conspiracy here.
>>
>> Where were you given that choice?
>> As far as I can see, you get no choice at all
>> unless you opt for a Custom Choice of packages
>> (which itself is non-default);
> 
> I must admit, I did. And probably so should everyone who knows what he wants.
> Those who go with the defaults should not complain that the defaults
> are not quite what they expect - as long as they're safe and sane
> ones.
> 
>> and then you have to choose the Desktop bundle,
>> uncheck Gnome and check KDE.
>> It's easy to overlook the fact that Gnome is checked in by default.
>>
>> Why not give users a simple choice with radio buttons?
> 
> There is a simple choice with checkboxes, if you chose to have choices.
> 
> Andras
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 14
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:12:26 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Jay Goodman" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Where does chkconfig store its settings?
> To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <26858.216.143.242.112.1182280346.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> 
> 
> It doesn't.  To see if a service is "on" or "off", it checks for the
> existence of the symlinks in the /etc/rcN.d directories
> 
> When you issue the command "chkconfig sendmail on",
> chckconfig looks for the "chkconfig:" line in the actual /etc/init.d/
> 
> In the sendmail case (i'm looking at RHEL3 at the moment) the chkconfig:
> line in /etc/init.d/sendmail  reads
> 
> chkconfig: 2345 80 30
> 
> issuing the command "chkconfig sendmail on" will create symlinks
> /etc/rd1.d/K30sendmail
> /etc/rd2.d/S80sendmail
> /etc/rd3.d/S80sendmail
> /etc/rd4.d/S80sendmail
> /etc/rd5.d/S80sendmail
> /etc/rd6.d/K30sendmail
> 
> issuing the command "chkconfig --list sendmail" checks for the existence
> of the start and kill links in the various runlevels (/etc/rcN.d/) to
> output its startup configuration
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> Where do chkconfig and system-config-services store their settings?
>>
>> I checked the man pages and Google and no luck, then tried making a change
>> to chkconfig and running "find / -mmin 10", and nothing obvious showed up.
>>
>> --
>> fedora-list mailing list
>> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:13:08 -0500
> From: "Chu Jeang Tan" <chujtan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Print odd-even pages
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <1d3a20d80706191213y73cd74dcj6b67bbad946df9c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Anyway to print odd/even pages only in apps such as evince and epiphany?
> 
> Is this a feature of the application, CUPS or the underlying CUPS driver?
> 
> -- 
> Chu Jeang Tan
> chujtan@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 16
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:13:14 -0400
> From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Selinux so badly corrupted machine can't start
> To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <46782ACA.6060809@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Tony Nelson wrote:
>> At 11:30 AM -0400 6/19/07, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>   
>>> Tony Nelson wrote:
>>>     
>>>> At 9:55 AM -0400 6/19/07, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>       
>>  ...
>>   
>>>>> autorelabel=1 (Does the same thing as touch /.autorelabel; reboot)
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>> Thanks.  How about adding that last one to
>>>> <http://danwalsh/livehournal.com/3144.html> ?
>>>>
>>>>       
>>> I just posted a new blog entry.
>>>     
>>
>> The string "autorelabel=1" does not show up in
>> <http://danwalsh/livehournal.com/3144.html> after refreshing.  There is
>> still only one instance of the word "autorelabel".  If you've put the word
>> on a different page, I didn't find it.
>>   
> It is a new blog entry.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 40, Issue 264
> ********************************************
how can we do for this ?


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux