Re: 2.6.23 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
From: Nigel Henry <cave.dnb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:09:24 +0200
In-reply-to: <470E4EB8.3070605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7ab3ad200710100830k18fd6b2cva9e445c792b45e5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200710111221.52994.cave.dnb@xxxxxxxxxx> <470E4EB8.3070605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

On Thursday 11 October 2007 18:26, John Wendel wrote:
> Nigel Henry wrote:
> > Gene. If you've enabled sound, and alsa in the 2.6.23, what alsa driver
> > version is it showing.
> > cat /proc/asound/version
> >
> > Nigel.
>
> 1.0.14 here.
>
> Regards,
>
> John

Hi John. I'm not surprised. I just saw another post on the alsa list, and I'd 
misread the earlier one. It seems that 1.0.15 is being pushed to the 2.6.24 
kernel, not 2.6.23. Doh.

Thanks anyway for the reply.

Nigel.

References:
- 2.6.23 kernel
  - From: Rohan Kulkarni
- Re: 2.6.23 kernel
  - From: Nigel Henry
- Re: 2.6.23 kernel
  - From: John Wendel

Prev by Date: is there more in the "kernel-devel" package than necessary?
Next by Date: Re: is there more in the "kernel-devel" package than necessary?
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]