Re: Adaptec ATA Raid 1200A upgrade [END GAME]

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Adaptec ATA Raid 1200A upgrade [END GAME]
• From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:14:14 +0100
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <20070926121521.GA31340@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903
• References: <20070922123616.GA9175@xxxxxxxxxx> <1190782704.4408.44.camel@home-desk> <20070926121521.GA31340@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Linux now says it now knows about this controller and offers to build
> a RAID array.  Don't trust it.  It _did_ seem to build an array on the

That would be dmraid not the kernel - please file a dmraid bug if so

> turning off the RAID function in the Adaptec and using it just as a
> reasonably high-performance ATA100/EIDE controller. I lose a small

What "RAID function". As far as anyone can tell the Adaptec 1200SA is a
rebadged generic IDE controller with some BIOS and Windows raid drivers.


Alan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Adaptec ATA Raid 1200A upgrade [END GAME]
    • From: Dave Ihnat

• References:
  • Adaptec ATA Raid 1200A upgrade
    • From: Dave Ihnat
  • Re: Adaptec ATA Raid 1200A upgrade
    • From: Sean Bruno
  • Re: Adaptec ATA Raid 1200A upgrade [END GAME]
    • From: Dave Ihnat

• Prev by Date: Re: reprocessing mbox to another email address
• Next by Date: Re: Adaptec ATA Raid 1200A upgrade [END GAME]
• Previous by thread: Re: Adaptec ATA Raid 1200A upgrade [END GAME]
• Next by thread: Re: Adaptec ATA Raid 1200A upgrade [END GAME]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread