On 9/25/07, Craig White <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:02 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Craig White wrote: > > >On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:21 +1000, Res wrote: > > >> knowing when they are done it works, not have to contact the NOC at 5AM > > >> because selinux has fucked them up the ass and they are stressing their > > >> clients cant interact with them, > > > > > >---- > > >nice - thanks for the visual metaphor - good thing you won't be confused > > >with someone with an objective point of view. > > > > > Stuff it Craig. Just because he doesn't have a view that co-incides with > > yours, doesn't mean he doesn't have a right to say it. > ---- > stuff it? > > The metaphor employed by Res simply is not appropriate for the list. His > point of view is/was/has been a non sequitur...and the reference to > repetitive anal insertion is at best stupid. > > Should anyone infer something from your defense of his anal insertion > references? dude give up. do what i did, block the appropriate individuals at the email client level and move on. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
