Re: update fails.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dave T

Applied yum -d 15 update. I get a long list on my screen in the chosen
terminal. How to convert this text on that screen in a text file?

KS

On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 12:36 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> CS wrote:
> > Trying to follow the update announcement in Fedora c6 for 4 packages
> > (xml-commons, jdom, velocity and xerces-j2) updates the update fails.
> > Dependencies state xml-commons= 0:1.3.02-0.b2.7jpp.10 to be missing. It
> > is not missing but the name is slightly different. 
> Sometimes the mirror accessed by yum/pup might not yet have an rpm to 
> download, even though the repo metadata has been updated.
> 
> >  I removed the package and re-installed. The problem is that on
> > resolving dependencies it gives an error, and in "details" it says:
> > missing dependency: xml-commons = 0:1.3.02-0.b2.7jpp.10 is needed by
> > package xml-commons-apis.
> > 
> > The file actually installed by package xml-commons-apis is
> > xml-commons-1.3.02-0.b2.7pp.10.i386.rpm. This file came with Eudora c6
> > install CD's.
> This is -apis dependency. Installing dependencies is normal.
> 
> > You see the slight difference at the beginning of the file, ie = 0:
> > instead of -
> The 0: is called an epoch. It can be used by rpm packagers to allow a 
> newer package to install an older version, even when the version-release 
> of the package would actually be older than the currently installed one.
> 
> > I guess this is the cause of the failed dependency.
> To see what versions you have installed:
> rpm -qa xml-\*
> 
> To see whats avail:
> yum list xml-*
> 
> > I sought for the file  ml-commons = 0:1.3.02-0.b2.7jpp.10 in the
> > repositories but could not find it.
> Is that version really available:
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/6/
> 
> > The problem is that these failing updates remain appearing between the
> > other updates and have to be skipped each time.
> I'm not sure about the current state of FC6, but I previously used the 
> yum-skip-broken plugin, and yum --skip-broken update
> This allows updates that don't have unresolved dependencies to complete, 
> and leaves the others for later. This assumes that if it is a fedora 
> reposotory problem, that it actually gets fixed.
> 
> > How to solve? Should the update be debugged?
> Yes:  yum -d 15 update  will help others work out what the problem is.
> 
> DaveT.
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux