On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 00:26:23 -0500, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 9/22/07, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:40:27 -0700, > > Bruce Byfield <bbyfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > However, why don't those who prefer not to have SELinux use Revisor to > > > make their own custom install disk that excludes it? > > > > Because it is part of the kernel and some user space code calls it. So you > > need to change existing packages, not just skipping installing some. This > > requires doing something at a lower level than Revisor. > > > So you would have it removed so that so us want it have to do all that > you have mentioned? Or we just leave it in, and those who don't want > to use it disable it? You misunderstood my response. I was explaining that the suggestion to use revisor wasn't going to work (without a lot of other work); not that I was interested in doing that.
